 |  | 


Since 1999, Falungong practitioners have been the target of an aggressive and often violent crackdown by
the Chinese government, one aspect of much broader tightening of controls on individuals and organizations
whose activities China's leaders perceive as threatening to Chinese Communist Party control. The past two
years have witnessed a deterioration in civil liberties nationwide, with disparate groups-political dissidents,
foreign scholars, labor organizers, religious believers worshiping outside official aegis, activists in Tibet and
Xinjiang, Internet users, academics, and editors whose messages challenge the Party line, among
others-facing new restrictions and abuses. The crackdown on Falungong is both symptomatic of the larger
trend and significant in its own right for the vehemence with which the authorities have moved to eradicate the
organization and "reeducate" its members.
This report provides a comprehensive account of the emergence of Falungong in China and the government's
response, with particular emphasis on events since the mass Falungong demonstration on April 25, 1999
outside Zhongnanhai, the compound in Beijing housing China's leaders. The report sets forth a detailed
chronology of major developments as well as analysis of existing data, much of it flawed, on who is in
custody in prisons, reeducation through labor camps,psychiatric institutions, and other incarceration facilities
and how they have been treated. Additional chapters address how the crackdown by Chinese authorities on
Falungong practitioners has spread beyond the mainland to Hong Kong and other countries, and analyze
some of the key reasons for the Chinese government's vehement response to Falungong. Two aspects of the
Chinese response are highlighted: the decision to ban Falungong and make its eradication a national priority,
and the decision to craft a series of laws and legal decisions, explanations, and interpretations to justify and
implement the crackdown, a development that has much to say about Chinese authorities' manipulation of the
legal system.
|
|